CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. ZYNGA, INC., 2:16-CV-00859-RCJ-VCF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160831f58
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Having considered the parties' briefs on Defendant Zynga Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21), the Court concludes that additional briefing is necessary. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties submit additional briefs on the issue of whether Plaintiffs' claims based on U.S. Patent No. 6,966,832 should be dismissed in light of Alice Corp. Pty. v. CLS Bank Int'l, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014), and the Court's August 29, 2016 order in CG Technology Develo
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Having considered the parties' briefs on Defendant Zynga Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21), the Court concludes that additional briefing is necessary. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties submit additional briefs on the issue of whether Plaintiffs' claims based on U.S. Patent No. 6,966,832 should be dismissed in light of Alice Corp. Pty. v. CLS Bank Int'l, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014), and the Court's August 29, 2016 order in CG Technology Develop..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Having considered the parties' briefs on Defendant Zynga Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21), the Court concludes that additional briefing is necessary.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties submit additional briefs on the issue of whether Plaintiffs' claims based on U.S. Patent No. 6,966,832 should be dismissed in light of Alice Corp. Pty. v. CLS Bank Int'l, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014), and the Court's August 29, 2016 order in CG Technology Development LLC, et al. v. Big Fish Games, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00857-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 29, 2016).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file an additional brief not exceeding 10 pages on or before September 12, 2016. Plaintiffs shall file a response not exceeding 10 pages on or before September 23, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
