STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

(SECOND REQUEST)

ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Gregory Garmong, by and through his counsel, Robert L. Langford, Esq., and Defendants the State of Nevada, James W. Hardesty, Kristina Pickering, Mark Gibbons, Michael A. Cherry, Michael Douglas, Nancy M. Saitta, and Ron D. Parraguirre, by and through their counsel, Jennifer Hostetler, that, pursuant to Local Rules IC 5-1(d), IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 7-1, the time within which Plaintiff Gregory Garmong may respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be extended from the present deadline of September 2, 2016, to September 9, 2016, as follows:

1. Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. no. 28) on July 15, 2016.

2. On August 1, 2016, the parties stipulated to an extension of time (Dkt. no. 31), which the Court granted (Dkt. no. 32), extending the date for responding to September 2, 2016.

3. Plaintiff Garmong's response is presently due September 2, 2016.

4. Counsel for Plaintiff has been engaged in drafting two appeals from murder convictions, one of which was a capital murder in which the defendant was sentenced to death.

5. Therefore, the parties agree to extend the time within which Plaintiff Garmong may respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to September 9, 2016.

6. This is the second request for an extension of time for Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

Therefore, the parties agree and request that the Court grant a second extension of time within which Plaintiff Garmong may file his Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, rendering it due September 9, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IS SO ORDERED.