Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

KLINE v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 2:16-cv-01381-APG-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160906563 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff Carolyn W. Kline (Plaintiff), through his attorney David Krieger, and Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA), through its attorneys Darren Brenner and Rex Garner with the law firm of Akerman LLP, as follows: On June 13, 2016, Plaintiff filed her Complaint (ECF No. 3). BANA
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(SECOND REQUEST)

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff Carolyn W. Kline (Plaintiff), through his attorney David Krieger, and Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA), through its attorneys Darren Brenner and Rex Garner with the law firm of Akerman LLP, as follows:

On June 13, 2016, Plaintiff filed her Complaint (ECF No. 3). BANA is currently gathering information in order to properly respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and is participating in serious settlement discussions with Plaintiff's counsel. In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, BANA has requested until September 9, 2016, in which to file its responsive pleading. Plaintiff is not opposed.

This is BANA's second request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and this stipulation is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Bank of America, N.A. shall have until September 9, 2016 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer