ORGANIS-SERRANO v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., 2:16-cv-00662-KJD-GWF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160907d22
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on March 25, 2016. Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) on June 7, 2016. Defendant filed an Opposition (ECF No. 9) on June 24, 2016. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days af
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on March 25, 2016. Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) on June 7, 2016. Defendant filed an Opposition (ECF No. 9) on June 24, 2016. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days aft..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on March 25, 2016. Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) on June 7, 2016. Defendant filed an Opposition (ECF No. 9) on June 24, 2016. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than September 9, 2016 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Source: Leagle
