Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Goldsmith v. Internal Revenue Service, 2:15-cv-02431 RFB GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160913c48 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2016
Summary: MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER [First Request] GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Comes now the defendant, the United States of America, pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1 and LR 26-4, to hereby request that the Court modify the scheduling order in this case, and states the following in support: The Court issued a Scheduling Order in this case on April 8, 2016. In accordance with the Court's order, the following deadlines are currently in effect: Dispositive Motions September 21, 201
More

MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

[First Request]

Comes now the defendant, the United States of America, pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1 and LR 26-4, to hereby request that the Court modify the scheduling order in this case, and states the following in support:

The Court issued a Scheduling Order in this case on April 8, 2016. In accordance with the Court's order, the following deadlines are currently in effect:

Dispositive Motions September 21, 2016 Pre-trial Order October 21, 2016

The parties have completed all discovery in this matter. A hearing on the United States Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for September 22, 2016. The United States requests that the dispositive motion date be continued, if necessary, until 30 days after the Court rules on the Motion to Dismiss. This request is not meant for delay but rather to conserve costs and resources.

Specifically, the United States respectfully requests that the Court amend the Scheduling Order as follows:

Dispositive Motions If necessary, due 30 days after the Court rules on the pending Motion to Dismiss Pre-trial Order If necessary, due 60 days after the Court rules on the pending Motion to Dismiss

In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the proposed joint pre-trial Order shall be suspended until thirty (30) days after decision of the dispositive motion or further Order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer