NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC v. MAPLEWOOD SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 2:15-cv-01683-JCM-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160919c28
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 70] (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plainitiff/Counter-Defendant, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC ("Nationstar") and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR HOLDERS OF THE GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2006-11 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-11 ("Deutsche") (or collectively known as "the Bank") and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and t
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 70] (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plainitiff/Counter-Defendant, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC ("Nationstar") and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR HOLDERS OF THE GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2006-11 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-11 ("Deutsche") (or collectively known as "the Bank") and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and th..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 70]
(First Request)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plainitiff/Counter-Defendant, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC ("Nationstar") and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR HOLDERS OF THE GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2006-11 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-11 ("Deutsche") (or collectively known as "the Bank") and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and through their undersigned counsel, to extend the deadline for SFR to file a Response to the Bank's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 70], filed on August 25, 2016, from September 19, 2016 to October 3, 2016.
The parties are discussing a possible stipulation to stay these proceedings pending a final decision in Bourne Valley. Rather than engage in what may become unnecessary motion practice at the time and expense of the parties and judicial resources, this request is being made to allow time for said discussions. This is SFR's first request for an extension and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
