STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

[FIRST REQUEST]

PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to LR 7-1 and LR IA 6-1, and Pound for Pound Promotions, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Golden Boy Promotions, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively the "Parties") stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant filed on August 15, 2016, a Motion to Transfer Venue [ECF No. 7].

2. Plaintiff timely filed on September 1, 2016, its Response to the Motion to Transfer [ECF Nos. 12 and 13]. Plaintiff also filed on that same day a Motion to Remand [ECF No. 14].

3. Defendants Reply in Support of the Motion to Transfer is presently due on Monday, September 12, 2016. Defendant's Response to the Motion to Remand is due on Monday, September 19, 2016.

4. Defendant's Reply in support of its Motion to Transfer and Defendant's Response to the Motion to Remand will have significant overlap on one of the primary issues raised in Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Transfer and Plaintiff's Motion to remand: whether there exists diversity jurisdiction.

5. Because of this overlap, the Parties stipulate that the time for Defendant to file its Reply in support of its Motion to Transfer shall be extended seven (7) days, to September 19, 2016, the same day Defendant is required to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand so that Defendant may file both briefs on those overlapping issues on the same day.

6. This is the first request for an extension of time for Defendant to file its Reply in support of its Motion to Transfer.

IT IS SO ODERED.