STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE AND TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF WILMINGTON WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO DISMISS

SECOND REQUEST

ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.

Pro se Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Dickerson and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), by and through its undersigned counsel (collectively the "Parties"), for good cause shown, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension for: (1) Wells Fargo to respond to Plaintiff's Motion For Leave to File an Amended Complaint filed on September 12, 2016 [Doc. No. 19]; and

(2) for Wells Fargo to file a reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 12]. Both briefs are currently due October 3, 2016. The Parties request the Court extend Wells Fargo's deadline for both briefs to October 14, 2016. This is the Parties' second extension request.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule 6-1, there exists good cause to grant this extension to respond for the following reasons:

1. Wells Fargo and its counsel require additional time to meaningfully prepare the briefs.

2. On September 20, 2016, the Parties agreed to the extension requested herein.

3. This stipulated extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the purpose of delay.

Therefore, the Parties jointly agree for an extension to October 14, 2016 for Wells Fargo to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint and for Wells Fargo to file a reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has until October 14, 2016 to file its Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has until October 14, 2016 to file its Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss.