Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STEINMETZ v. CITIGROUP, INC., 2:16-CV-01557-APG-VCF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20161011b18 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CITIBANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Eric Steinmetz filed a complaint alleging negligent and willful violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Nevada's Deceptive Trade Practices Act against defendant Citibank, N.A. (incorrectly named in the Complaint as "Citigroup, Inc.") ("Citibank"). (ECF No. 1). At Citibank's request, plaintiff and Citibank stipulate and agree that Citibank has
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CITIBANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Eric Steinmetz filed a complaint alleging negligent and willful violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Nevada's Deceptive Trade Practices Act against defendant Citibank, N.A. (incorrectly named in the Complaint as "Citigroup, Inc.") ("Citibank"). (ECF No. 1). At Citibank's request, plaintiff and Citibank stipulate and agree that Citibank has up to and including November 6, 2016, to respond to plaintiff's complaint, to provide time for Citibank to investigate plaintiff's allegations and for the parties to discuss a potential early resolution of the claims asserted against Citibank.

This request is made in good faith and not made for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer