FLORENCE v. REALTIME RESOLUTIONS, INC., 2:16-cv-00692-APG-GWF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161018e10
Filed: Oct. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 67) filed on October 14, 2016. The proposed protective order is unclear whether the party, who asserts that particular information should be treated as confidential under the protective order, has the burden of proof to establish that the information or document is entitled to such protection. The parties are directed to submit a revised protective order with that clarif
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 67) filed on October 14, 2016. The proposed protective order is unclear whether the party, who asserts that particular information should be treated as confidential under the protective order, has the burden of proof to establish that the information or document is entitled to such protection. The parties are directed to submit a revised protective order with that clarifi..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 67) filed on October 14, 2016. The proposed protective order is unclear whether the party, who asserts that particular information should be treated as confidential under the protective order, has the burden of proof to establish that the information or document is entitled to such protection. The parties are directed to submit a revised protective order with that clarification. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 67) is denied, without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
