STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT SETERUS, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(SECOND REQUEST)

PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.

This is the second Stipulated Request to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint made by and between Plaintiff James Birkan ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Seterus, Inc. ("Seterus") through their respective counsel. This Request is made in light of the following facts:

RECITALS

A. Plaintiff filed the Complaint ("Complaint") against Seterus on or about August 30, 2016.

B. Seterus was served with the Complaint on September 19, 2016.

C. The parties stipulated to extend Seterus' time to respond to the Complaint through October 21, 2016, in order to give Seterus time to investigate Plaintiff's claims and prepare a proper response, and for the parties to discuss a potential resolution of this matter. Dkt. 8.

D. On October 7, 2016, the Court granted the parties stipulation. Dkt. 9.

E. Upon Seterus' request, the parties agreed to further extend Seterus' time to respond to the Complaint through November 4, 2016, in order to give Seterus the additional time necessary to investigate Plaintiff's claims and prepare a proper response, and for the parties to discuss a potential resolution of this matter.

F. There is good cause to grant this stipulation because Seterus requires additional time to investigate Plaintiff's claims and prepare a proper response, and the parties require additional time to consider a resolution of this matter.

G. Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff and Seterus respectfully request that the Court extend Seterus' time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint through November 4, 2016.

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Seterus hereby stipulate and agree that Seterus has up to and including November 4, 2016, to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

IT IS SO ORDERED.