Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. FLOREZ, 2:15-cr-071-JAD-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20161024a92 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2016
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WAIVE APPEARANCE AT ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA HEARING ON THIRD SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW THE DEFENDANT, Jose Roglio Florez, by and through Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender and his counsel of record, Paul D. Riddle, Assistant Federal Public Defender, and hereby respectfully moves this Court for an order to waive his appearance on the Third Superseding Indictment (ECF 135) filed on October 5, 2016. Although Federal Rules of
More

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WAIVE APPEARANCE AT ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA HEARING ON THIRD SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

COMES NOW THE DEFENDANT, Jose Roglio Florez, by and through Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender and his counsel of record, Paul D. Riddle, Assistant Federal Public Defender, and hereby respectfully moves this Court for an order to waive his appearance on the Third Superseding Indictment (ECF 135) filed on October 5, 2016.

Although Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 43(a) mandate a defendant appear for the initial arraignment and plea on indictment, defendant Jose Roglio Florez made his initial appearance for arraignment and plea in this case on March 18, 2015 (ECF 15).

After conferring, government counsel has indicated to undersigned defense counsel that he is not opposed to the waiver of Mr. Florez's appearance. The third superseding indictment filed has changed count three from Armed Bank Robbery to Interference with Commerce by Robbery, however, the factual allegations remain the same.

The defendant, Jose Roglio Florez, hereby requests this Court to proceed during defendant's absence pursuant to this waiver, and hereby agrees that defendant's interests are deemed represented at all times by the presence of defense counsel:

(1) The defendant affirms he has received and read a copy of the indictment and understands the nature of the charge(s); (2) The defendant understands and acknowledges that he has the right to remain silent, the right to trial by jury, the right to compulsory process, and the right to the assistance of counsel; (3) Counsel affirms that he has no reason to question the defendant's competence to assist in the defense of the case; (4) Defendant has a right to be present at the arraignment and waives that right; (5) Defendant's plea to the charge(s) is not guilty

Accordingly, Mr. Florez respectfully requests the Court waive his appearance Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 3:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer