Buzauskas v. Colvin, 2:16-cv-01901-GMN-VCF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161025h76
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2016
Summary: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests that the Court extend the time from October 21, 2016 to November 21, 2016 for Defendant to answer the complaint and submit the certified administrative record (CAR). This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that the requested extension is
Summary: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests that the Court extend the time from October 21, 2016 to November 21, 2016 for Defendant to answer the complaint and submit the certified administrative record (CAR). This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that the requested extension is ..
More
DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests that the Court extend the time from October 21, 2016 to November 21, 2016 for Defendant to answer the complaint and submit the certified administrative record (CAR).
This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that the requested extension is needed to allow the Commissioner to prepare the CAR for submission to this Court and parties in this action. The CAR in this case is particularly large and has taken longer than anticipated to prepare for filing despite the Commissioner's diligent efforts to have it ready in time. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
Counsel for Defendant conferred via email with Plaintiff's counsel, who indicated on October 21, 2016 that Plaintiff does not oppose this motion or the requested extension.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
