Filed: Nov. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT F & H MINE SUPPLY, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) WILLIAM G. COBB , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR 7-1, Plaintiffs, CARRA OTTO, as the surviving spouse of RICHARD OTTO; and CARRA OTTO as the Administratrix of the Estate of RICHARD OTTO, ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their counsel, William C. Jeanney, Esq., of the law firm Bradley, Drendel & Jeanney, and Defendant F & H MINE SUPPLY, INC., erroneously
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT F & H MINE SUPPLY, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) WILLIAM G. COBB , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR 7-1, Plaintiffs, CARRA OTTO, as the surviving spouse of RICHARD OTTO; and CARRA OTTO as the Administratrix of the Estate of RICHARD OTTO, ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their counsel, William C. Jeanney, Esq., of the law firm Bradley, Drendel & Jeanney, and Defendant F & H MINE SUPPLY, INC., erroneously s..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT F & H MINE SUPPLY, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)
WILLIAM G. COBB, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to LR 7-1, Plaintiffs, CARRA OTTO, as the surviving spouse of RICHARD OTTO; and CARRA OTTO as the Administratrix of the Estate of RICHARD OTTO, ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their counsel, William C. Jeanney, Esq., of the law firm Bradley, Drendel & Jeanney, and Defendant F & H MINE SUPPLY, INC., erroneously sued as F & H MINE SUPPLY, ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel, Robert E. Schumacher, Esq. and Liane S. Binowitz, Esq. of the law firm Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP ("GR"), hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint filed on September 28, 2016. Defendant's response is currently due on November 2, 2016 and pursuant to this Stipulation, will be continued to November 23, 2016.
Said continuance is being stipulated to in order to give Defendant adequate time to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint in light of GR's recent retention. There have been no previous continuances or extensions requested regarding the filing of Defendant's response.
