STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER AND AMEND ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE.

ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiffs Christopher L. Marchand, Esq. of the Law Office of Daniel Marks and counsel for the Defendant Debra L. Pieruschka, Esq. that the time to file Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Alter and Amend Order (1) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, (2) Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and (3) Granting Defendant's Motion to Extend the Dispositive Motion Deadline be extended for a period of seven (7) days, from October 17, 2016 to October 24, 2016. Good cause exists for the following reasons: (1) Plaintiff is Replying to a detailed Motion and Opposition which has taken longer than normal to draft; (2) Plaintiff is currently out of state and would like additional time to meaningfully contribute to the drafting of the Reply.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED the time to file Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Alter and Amend Order (1) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, (2) Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and (3) Granting Defendant's Motion to Extend the Dispositive Motion Deadline be extended for a period of seven (7) days, from October 17, 2016 to October 24, 2016.