HARRIS v. VANTAGE CREDIT UNION, 2:16-CV-02270-GMN-VCF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161118d50
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1] FIRST REQUEST CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff Becky A. Harris ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Vantage Credit Union ("Vantage"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows: STIPULATION 1. Plaintiff filed her Complaint on September 27, 2016 [ECF No. 1]. 2. Vantage recently retained counsel and a short extension is necessary to allow Va
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1] FIRST REQUEST CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff Becky A. Harris ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Vantage Credit Union ("Vantage"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows: STIPULATION 1. Plaintiff filed her Complaint on September 27, 2016 [ECF No. 1]. 2. Vantage recently retained counsel and a short extension is necessary to allow Van..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1]
FIRST REQUEST
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff Becky A. Harris ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Vantage Credit Union ("Vantage"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:
STIPULATION
1. Plaintiff filed her Complaint on September 27, 2016 [ECF No. 1].
2. Vantage recently retained counsel and a short extension is necessary to allow Vantage's counsel to obtain the file and investigate the allegations in the Complaint before responding.
3. Plaintiff and Vantage also anticipate in engaging in settlement discussions on this case and wish to extend the deadline for Vantage to respond to the Complaint until December 8, 2016. This will allow the parties to continue settlement discussions without incurring additional fees and expenses.
4. Vantage requests additional time to file a response to the Complaint and Plaintiff does not object to the request.
5. Therefore, the parties agree that Vantage's response to the Complaint is now due on or before December 8, 2016.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
