U.S. v. BAUTISTA, 2:05-CR-071-JCM-GWF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161129891
Visitors: 28
Filed: Oct. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . The matter before the court is to clarify the order of restitution previously entered as part of the Judgment in Criminal Case (#44) on December 13, 2006. Upon further review of the restitution order in this matter, the specifics needed to complete the order of restitution was not made a part of the Judgment. Therefore, good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall make restitution to the following payee(s) in the amount(s) listed be
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . The matter before the court is to clarify the order of restitution previously entered as part of the Judgment in Criminal Case (#44) on December 13, 2006. Upon further review of the restitution order in this matter, the specifics needed to complete the order of restitution was not made a part of the Judgment. Therefore, good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall make restitution to the following payee(s) in the amount(s) listed bel..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
The matter before the court is to clarify the order of restitution previously entered as part of the Judgment in Criminal Case (#44) on December 13, 2006. Upon further review of the restitution order in this matter, the specifics needed to complete the order of restitution was not made a part of the Judgment. Therefore, good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall make restitution to the following payee(s) in the amount(s) listed below:
Name of Payee: IRS — RACS
Total Amount of Restitution Ordered: $174,000.00
Source: Leagle
