Vilela v. Valley Health System, LLC, 2:16-cv-01503-RFB-CVH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161205552
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiffs Amy Vilela ("Viela"), Jozette Figueredo ("Figueredo"), Amy Vilela as the Special Administrator of the Estate of Shalynne Ramos (the "Ramos Estate") (collectively "Plaintiffs"); Defendant Valley Health System, LLC, d/b/a Centennial Hills Hospital Medical Center ("Valley Health"); and Defendant Tanya Netz, PAC, ("Netz") hereby stipu
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiffs Amy Vilela ("Viela"), Jozette Figueredo ("Figueredo"), Amy Vilela as the Special Administrator of the Estate of Shalynne Ramos (the "Ramos Estate") (collectively "Plaintiffs"); Defendant Valley Health System, LLC, d/b/a Centennial Hills Hospital Medical Center ("Valley Health"); and Defendant Tanya Netz, PAC, ("Netz") hereby stipul..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Amy Vilela ("Viela"), Jozette Figueredo ("Figueredo"), Amy Vilela as the Special Administrator of the Estate of Shalynne Ramos (the "Ramos Estate") (collectively "Plaintiffs"); Defendant Valley Health System, LLC, d/b/a Centennial Hills Hospital Medical Center ("Valley Health"); and Defendant Tanya Netz, PAC, ("Netz") hereby stipulate as follows:
(1) The due date for Valley Health's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (Doc #14) is currently October 27, 2016.
(2) The parties agree that the due date for the Reply should be extended to November 3, 2016.
(3) Counsel for Valley Health is currently working on over twenty reply briefs in support of motions in limine for a case with a firm trial date. A one-week extension is therefore needed to complete the Reply in this matter.
(4) No parties will be prejudiced by the contemplated extension. Discovery has not yet begun, and no trial date is set in this matter.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
ORDER
Pursuant to the terms of the attached stipulation, the Court orders as follows:
1. Good cause exists for extension of the due date for Valley Health Systems, LLC's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #14).
2. The due date for the Reply is extended to November 3, 2016.
Source: Leagle
