JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, 2:16-cv-02198-RFB-NJK. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161213b34
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COUNTERCLAIM NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") currently has until December 12, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaim (ECF No. 27) filed by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") in this matter. In order to allow Chase further time to investigate the Counterclaim and prepare a response thereto, Chase and SFR hereby stipulate and agree th
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COUNTERCLAIM NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") currently has until December 12, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaim (ECF No. 27) filed by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") in this matter. In order to allow Chase further time to investigate the Counterclaim and prepare a response thereto, Chase and SFR hereby stipulate and agree tha..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COUNTERCLAIM
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") currently has until December 12, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaim (ECF No. 27) filed by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") in this matter. In order to allow Chase further time to investigate the Counterclaim and prepare a response thereto, Chase and SFR hereby stipulate and agree that Chase shall have up to and including December 16, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaim. This is the parties' first request for an extension. It is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
