BAYS v. FRONTIER FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION, 3:16-cv-00656-HDM-WGC. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161221g22
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Pending Motions HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . Plaintiff Michelle M. Bays ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Frontier Financial Credit Union ("Defendant") (jointly as the "Parties"), by and through counsel, stipulate for a 14 day extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 22, and Motion to Abstain, ECF No. 23. Defendant filed its motions on December 2, 2016. Plaintiff has requested in
Summary: ORDER GRANTING Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Pending Motions HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . Plaintiff Michelle M. Bays ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Frontier Financial Credit Union ("Defendant") (jointly as the "Parties"), by and through counsel, stipulate for a 14 day extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 22, and Motion to Abstain, ECF No. 23. Defendant filed its motions on December 2, 2016. Plaintiff has requested in g..
More
ORDER GRANTING
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Pending Motions
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michelle M. Bays ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Frontier Financial Credit Union ("Defendant") (jointly as the "Parties"), by and through counsel, stipulate for a 14 day extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 22, and Motion to Abstain, ECF No. 23. Defendant filed its motions on December 2, 2016.
Plaintiff has requested in good faith and not for the purpose of delay, and Defendant agrees, for an additional 14 days to file oppositions to the motions because of the upcoming holidays and counsel's schedule. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline.
THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by the Parties as follows:
(1) Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, ECF No. 22, on or before January 2, 2017; and
(2) Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Motion to Abstain, ECF No. 23, on or before January 2, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
