Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WILLIAMS v. CERIDA INVESTMENT CORP., 2:16-cv-00284-JAD-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170103676 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff MICHELLE WILLIAMS, by and through her counsel of record, Ryan Alexander, Esq. of Ryan Alexander, Chtd. and Defendants CERIDA INVESTMENT CORP. ("Cerida") and ANSWERNET, INC. ("AnswerNet"), collectively (the "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, Deanna L. Forbush, Esq. of Morris Polich & Purdy LLP, that this action be dismissed, with prejudice,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff MICHELLE WILLIAMS, by and through her counsel of record, Ryan Alexander, Esq. of Ryan Alexander, Chtd. and Defendants CERIDA INVESTMENT CORP. ("Cerida") and ANSWERNET, INC. ("AnswerNet"), collectively (the "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, Deanna L. Forbush, Esq. of Morris Polich & Purdy LLP, that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, in its entirety, each party bearing her/its own costs and attorney's fees.

ORDER

Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 28] and with good cause appearing and no reason to delay, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is DISMISSED in its entirety, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer