Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ, 2:16-cr-00030-JAD-(CWH). (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170105f03 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING (First Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Kristine M. Kuzemka, Esq., counsel for defendant, Rafael Cruz-Rodriguez, and Daniel Bogden, United States Attorney; Susan Cushman, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, that sentencing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled to commence on Monday, December 19, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. be vacated and continued t
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING (First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Kristine M. Kuzemka, Esq., counsel for defendant, Rafael Cruz-Rodriguez, and Daniel Bogden, United States Attorney; Susan Cushman, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, that sentencing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled to commence on Monday, December 19, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. be vacated and continued to a date and time convenient to all parties, but no earlier than 45 days.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reason:

1. The sentencing is being continued to give additional defendants the opportunity to plead guilty and qualify for the two-level reduction for a group plea. 2. The parties agree to the continuance. 3. The defendant is in custody but does not object to the continuance. 4. This is the first request to continue the sentencing.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based upon the pending Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. That co-defendant is still pending plea and Defendant RAFAEL CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ requests this continuance so that he can receive the benefit of the group plea reduction prior to the imposition of his sentence; 2. That the AUSA Susan Cushman is in agreement with the continuance; 3. That counsel has spoken to her client, RAFAEL CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ, who is in custody, and he has no objection to the continuance; and 4. That denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that sentencing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for December 19, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. be vacated and continued until February 6, 2017, at the hour of 1:30 p.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer