Brown v. The Bank of New York Mellon, 2:16-cv-02777-RFB-CWH. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170106e34
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO BANK OF AMERICA'S MOTION TO DISMISS [SECOND REQUEST] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR 7-1, Defendant Bank of America and Plaintiffs Cleveland Brown and Sandra Brown, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On December 5, 2016, the instant matter was removed from the Eighth Judicial District of Nevada Court and assigned to Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge C
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO BANK OF AMERICA'S MOTION TO DISMISS [SECOND REQUEST] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR 7-1, Defendant Bank of America and Plaintiffs Cleveland Brown and Sandra Brown, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On December 5, 2016, the instant matter was removed from the Eighth Judicial District of Nevada Court and assigned to Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Ca..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO BANK OF AMERICA'S MOTION TO DISMISS [SECOND REQUEST]
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR 7-1, Defendant Bank of America and Plaintiffs Cleveland Brown and Sandra Brown, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On December 5, 2016, the instant matter was removed from the Eighth Judicial District of Nevada Court and assigned to Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman.
2. On December 9, 2016, Defendant Bank of America filed its Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 3).
3. On December 21, 2016 Defendant Bank of America granted Plaintiff's counsel's request to extend the time allowed for Plaintiffs to file their response to the Motion to Dismiss to December 30, 2016 (ECF No. 8).
4. The Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend time allowed for Plaintiffs to file their response to the Motion to Dismiss to January 3, 2017. The reason for this request is to accommodate the schedule of counsel for Plaintiffs.
5. The Parties hereby stipulate to a two (2) week extension for Defendant Bank of America to file its reply to the response above the initial time allowed based on the new Opposition Date.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response to the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 3) is hereby extended to January 3, 2017. The deadline for Defendant Bank of America to file its reply is hereby extended two (2) weeks based on the extended deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
