THE ESTATE OF BURGARD EX REL. HORAN v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 2:15-cv-00833-RFD-GWF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170130a13
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING ERISA PREEMPTION AND ELIGIBILITY FOR BENEFITS AND SUPPLEMENT (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . The Parties have stipulated to give Plaintiff a seven (7) day extension of time to file the Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding ERISA Preemption and Eligibility for Benefits (ECF No. 47) and Supplement (ECF NO. 65) in this matter. The
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING ERISA PREEMPTION AND ELIGIBILITY FOR BENEFITS AND SUPPLEMENT (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . The Parties have stipulated to give Plaintiff a seven (7) day extension of time to file the Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding ERISA Preemption and Eligibility for Benefits (ECF No. 47) and Supplement (ECF NO. 65) in this matter. The ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING ERISA PREEMPTION AND ELIGIBILITY FOR BENEFITS AND SUPPLEMENT (First Request)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
The Parties have stipulated to give Plaintiff a seven (7) day extension of time to file the Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding ERISA Preemption and Eligibility for Benefits (ECF No. 47) and Supplement (ECF NO. 65) in this matter. The reasons supporting this stipulation are as follows: Plaintiffs counsel has been in several mediations and depositions.
The Parties request a seven day extension of time, up to and including, January 26, 2017, for Plaintiff to file its Opposition. The Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days after the Omnibus Opposition is filed to file a reply brief. This is the first extension of time requested by the Parties related to this Motion (ECF No. 47).
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties that Plaintiff shall have up to and including January 26, 2017, to file its Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding ERISA Preemption and Eligibility for Benefits (ECF No. 47) and Supplement (ECF NO. 65 ). The Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days after the Omnibus Opposition is filed to file a reply brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
