STRICT SCRUTINY MEDIA, CO. v. CITY OF RENO, 3:16-cv-00734. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170130a33
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND [First Request] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . STRICT SCRUTINY MEDIA, CO. ("Plaintiff"), by and through its attorneys of record, and Defendant THE CITY OF RENO'S ("City" or "Reno"), by and through its attorneys of record, do hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff may have an additional time within which to respond to the City's Opposition to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc#12). Plaintiff's counsel is ill an
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND [First Request] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . STRICT SCRUTINY MEDIA, CO. ("Plaintiff"), by and through its attorneys of record, and Defendant THE CITY OF RENO'S ("City" or "Reno"), by and through its attorneys of record, do hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff may have an additional time within which to respond to the City's Opposition to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc#12). Plaintiff's counsel is ill and..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND
[First Request]
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
STRICT SCRUTINY MEDIA, CO. ("Plaintiff"), by and through its attorneys of record, and Defendant THE CITY OF RENO'S ("City" or "Reno"), by and through its attorneys of record, do hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff may have an additional time within which to respond to the City's Opposition to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc#12). Plaintiff's counsel is ill and is not able to complete the Plaintiff's response within the time currently scheduled. Therefore, the parties respectfully request an extension to Friday, February 3, 2017 within which for Plaintiff to respond to the City's Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction. No prejudice will be had by Defendant if the extension is granted and this extension is not requested for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED, that Plaintiff may have until Friday, February 3, 2017, within which to file its response to the City's Opposition to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
Source: Leagle
