Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY v. SONRISA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 2:16-cv-01963-GMN-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170203b17 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DEADLINE TO MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 8] (Second Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("Defendant') and Defendant Sonrisa Homeowners Association ("Association") by and through their respective counsel stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On September 1, 2016, the Association filed a Motion to Dismiss as ECF No. 8. 2. On November 14, 2016, Defendant filed its Limited Opposition to the Association's Motion to
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DEADLINE TO MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 8]

(Second Request)

SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("Defendant') and Defendant Sonrisa Homeowners Association ("Association") by and through their respective counsel stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On September 1, 2016, the Association filed a Motion to Dismiss as ECF No. 8. 2. On November 14, 2016, Defendant filed its Limited Opposition to the Association's Motion to Dismiss as ECF No. 25. 3. The Association's Reply is due November 23, 2016.

IT HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Association will have a two-week extension to file its Reply.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Association's Reply shall be filed on or before December 30, 2016.

This is the Parties second request of this deadline and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer