Filed: Feb. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2017
Summary: SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT CIT BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT C.W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Defendant CIT Bank, N.A. (" CIT "), through its attorney Jacob Bundick, Esq. with the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, hereby moves the Court for an extension of time to through and including February 10, 2017 for CIT to answer, respond, or otherwise plead to Plaintiff Plaintiff's Complaint in this action. Plaintiff's a
Summary: SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT CIT BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT C.W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Defendant CIT Bank, N.A. (" CIT "), through its attorney Jacob Bundick, Esq. with the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, hereby moves the Court for an extension of time to through and including February 10, 2017 for CIT to answer, respond, or otherwise plead to Plaintiff Plaintiff's Complaint in this action. Plaintiff's at..
More
SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT CIT BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
C.W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
Defendant CIT Bank, N.A. ("CIT"), through its attorney Jacob Bundick, Esq. with the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, hereby moves the Court for an extension of time to through and including February 10, 2017 for CIT to answer, respond, or otherwise plead to Plaintiff Plaintiff's Complaint in this action. Plaintiff's attorney Vernon A. Nelson, Jr., Esq. has represented to the undersigned Counsel that Plaintiff has no opposition to the requested extension herein, and has agreed to the requested extension. Cause exists for the requested extension as Counsel for CIT was recently retained and still requires some additional time to further review CIT's records and assess Plaintiff's Complaint. This is CIT's second request for an extension which is not filed for purposes of delay or any other improper purpose.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED THAT CIT Bank, N.A. shall have until February 10, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
