Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

D'Amico v. Aranas, 3:15-cv-00457-RCJ-VPC. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170221i09 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff, Donald D'Amico, by and through counsel Amy Rose, and Defendants, Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, and Justin Henley, by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Benjamin R. Johnson, Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1), that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice by order of this Cour
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Donald D'Amico, by and through counsel Amy Rose, and Defendants, Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, and Justin Henley, by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Benjamin R. Johnson, Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1), that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice by order of this Court.

This Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice is executed as part of an out-of-court settlement between the parties. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Full and Final Release, each party will bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. The Court has examined the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice as agreed by the parties hereinabove, good cause having been shown,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer