In re Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation, 1566 (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170222g23
Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER (Sealed Exhibits — ECF No. 2567) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendants failure to respond to the court's Order (ECF No. 2577) denying without prejudice Plaintiffs' Motions For Leave to File Documents Under Seal (ECF No. 2566, 2571) and instructing the designating party (or parties) to file a memorandum of points and authorities and any supporting declaration or affidavit to make a particularized showing as to why certain documents should rem
Summary: ORDER (Sealed Exhibits — ECF No. 2567) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendants failure to respond to the court's Order (ECF No. 2577) denying without prejudice Plaintiffs' Motions For Leave to File Documents Under Seal (ECF No. 2566, 2571) and instructing the designating party (or parties) to file a memorandum of points and authorities and any supporting declaration or affidavit to make a particularized showing as to why certain documents should rema..
More
ORDER
(Sealed Exhibits — ECF No. 2567)
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendants failure to respond to the court's Order (ECF No. 2577) denying without prejudice Plaintiffs' Motions For Leave to File Documents Under Seal (ECF No. 2566, 2571) and instructing the designating party (or parties) to file a memorandum of points and authorities and any supporting declaration or affidavit to make a particularized showing as to why certain documents should remain under seal. The sealed documents were referenced as Exhibits C, D, I, J, and 1-3 to Exhibit H. See Sealed Exhibits (ECF No. 2567). The court instructed the designating party (or parties) to make a particularized showing on or before September 28, 2016. See Order (ECF No. 2577). However, no response was filed and the deadline to do so has now expired. The parties were cautioned that if they failed to timely comply with the Order, the Clerk of the Court would be directed to unseal the documents to make them available on the public docket. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall UNSEAL the Sealed Exhibits (ECF No. 2567).
Source: Leagle
