LE v. ZUFFA, LLC, 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL.1 (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170223g45
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER (Sealed Exhibits — ECF Nos. 280, 289 PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the parties' failure to respond to the court's Order (ECF No. 293) denying the Motions to Seal (ECF No. 280) without prejudice and instructing the designating party (or parties) to file a memorandum of points and authorities and any supporting declaration or affidavit to make a particularized showing as to why certain documents should remain under seal. Plaintiffs sought leave t
Summary: ORDER (Sealed Exhibits — ECF Nos. 280, 289 PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the parties' failure to respond to the court's Order (ECF No. 293) denying the Motions to Seal (ECF No. 280) without prejudice and instructing the designating party (or parties) to file a memorandum of points and authorities and any supporting declaration or affidavit to make a particularized showing as to why certain documents should remain under seal. Plaintiffs sought leave to..
More
ORDER
(Sealed Exhibits — ECF Nos. 280, 289
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties' failure to respond to the court's Order (ECF No. 293) denying the Motions to Seal (ECF No. 280) without prejudice and instructing the designating party (or parties) to file a memorandum of points and authorities and any supporting declaration or affidavit to make a particularized showing as to why certain documents should remain under seal. Plaintiffs sought leave to file under seal because counsel for Defendant Zuffa, LLC designated certain documents as confidential. The documents were referenced as Exhibits 2, 7, and 9 of the Rayhill Declaration. See Sealed Exhibit 2 (ECF No. 281-3); Exhibit 7 (ECF No. 281-6); Exhibit 9 (ECF No. 281-7). The court instructed the designating party (or parties) to make a particularized showing on or before September 29, 2016. See Order (ECF No. 293). However, no response was filed and the deadline to do so has now expired. The parties were cautioned that if they failed to timely comply with the Order, the Clerk of the Court would be directed to unseal the documents to make them available on the public docket.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED: The Clerk of the Court SHALL UNSEAL Exhibit 2 (ECF No. 281-3), Exhibit 7 (ECF No. 281-6), and Exhibit 9 (ECF No. 281-7).
FootNotes
1. Member Case Nos.: 2:15-cv-01046-RCJ-NJK; 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF; 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF; and 2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH.
Source: Leagle
