Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Agha-Khan v. The Bank of New York Mellon, 2:16-cv-02651-RFB-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170301e52 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2017
Summary: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Defendants The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2005-72 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-72 ( BNYM ), incorrectly sued as "The Bank of New York Mellon," Bayview Loans Servicing, LLC ( Bayview ), Dorka Bouza ( Bouza ), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, I
More

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2005-72 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-72 (BNYM), incorrectly sued as "The Bank of New York Mellon," Bayview Loans Servicing, LLC (Bayview), Dorka Bouza (Bouza), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. (MERSCORP, and collectively, defendants) pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby move this Court for an extension of time to file its reply in support of their motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6). In support of this motion, defendants states as follows:

1. This is defendants' first request for an extension of time to file their reply.

2. Defendants filed their motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) on January 26, 2017.

3. Plaintiff filed her opposition on February 3, 2017.

4. Defendants response is currently due on February 10, 2017.

5. Defendants request a one-week extension to finalize their reply in support of the motion to dismiss to allow defendants further time to research the issues contained within plaintiff's opposition filed on February 3, 2017.

6. Accordingly, defendants requests an extension of time of seven (7) days to file its responsive pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer