Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TransFIRST GROUP, INC. v. MAGLIARDITI, 2:17-CV-00487-APG-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170308i73 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2017
Summary: EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW, Defendants Francine Magliarditi; FRM Trust; DJM Irrevocable Trust; Fane Trust; ATM Enterprises, LLC; DII Capital, Inc.; DFM Holdings, Ltd., DFM Holdings, LP; and DII Properties, LLC ("Defendants") file this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond and, in support thereof, would show unto the Court as f
More

EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND

(First Request)

COMES NOW, Defendants Francine Magliarditi; FRM Trust; DJM Irrevocable Trust; Fane Trust; ATM Enterprises, LLC; DII Capital, Inc.; DFM Holdings, Ltd., DFM Holdings, LP; and DII Properties, LLC ("Defendants") file this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond and, in support thereof, would show unto the Court as follows:

1. The above-entitled action was received by the Court from the Northern District of Texas on February 15, 2017 pursuant to a court order (ECF No. 37). The Court has ordered (ECF No. 39) that all non-resident counsel file a Verified Petition, Motion for Permission to Practice in This Case Only by April 2, 2017. The Court has further ordered (ECF No. 39) that counsel shall have until March 18, 2017 to file a Joint Status Report.

2. Defendants have recently retained the undersigned attorneys to act as their counsel in this matter and their Notice of Appearance (ECF No. 41) was filed on March 2, 2017, and counsel needs additional time to consider the relevant defenses and the appropriate course of action in response to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint.

3. Counsel for Plaintiffs has agreed that Defendants may have a two (2) week extension from March 18, 2017, in which to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, and is not opposed to this motion.

4. This is the first request for an extension of time in which to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint.

5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay.

THEREFORE, Defendants request that the Court enter an Order granting their Motion and that the Defendants have two (2) weeks from March 18, 2017 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer