Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Toldi v. Hyundai Capital America, 2:16-cv-01877-APG-GWF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170310d70 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (First Request) GRORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . The parties hereby stipulate to entry of an order extending the time for defendant Hyundai Capital America, doing business as Hyundai Motor Finance ("HCA"), to respond to the complaint by one week, to March 16, 2017. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to respond to the complaint. On September 1, 2016, HCA filed motions to dismiss the complaint or, alternatively, to
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (First Request)

The parties hereby stipulate to entry of an order extending the time for defendant Hyundai Capital America, doing business as Hyundai Motor Finance ("HCA"), to respond to the complaint by one week, to March 16, 2017.

This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to respond to the complaint. On September 1, 2016, HCA filed motions to dismiss the complaint or, alternatively, to stay the action pending the D.C. Circuit Court's ruling in ACA International v. Federal Communications Commission, No. 15-1211 (D.C. Cir., appeal filed July 10, 2015). ECF Nos. 11, 12. On February 23, 2017, the Court issued its Order denying the motions. ECF No. 54. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 12(a)(4)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, HCA's response to the complaint is due by March 9, 2017. HCA requires a brief extension of time to complete its investigation of plaintiff's claims and to respond to the complaint accordingly.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer