LATHAM v. TUTOR PERINI BUILDING CORP., 2:17-cv-00071-RFB-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170313e34
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26-1(a). The parties' status report, Docket No. 7, which asks the Court to set a discovery deadline that is twice the length of the presumptively reasonable period, fails to comply with the Court's local rules. See LR 26-1. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint proposed discovery plan that complies in full with the Court's local rules, no later tha
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26-1(a). The parties' status report, Docket No. 7, which asks the Court to set a discovery deadline that is twice the length of the presumptively reasonable period, fails to comply with the Court's local rules. See LR 26-1. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint proposed discovery plan that complies in full with the Court's local rules, no later than..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26-1(a). The parties' status report, Docket No. 7, which asks the Court to set a discovery deadline that is twice the length of the presumptively reasonable period, fails to comply with the Court's local rules. See LR 26-1. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint proposed discovery plan that complies in full with the Court's local rules, no later than March 17, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
