CASTRO v. POULTON, 2:15-CV-1908 JCM (GWF). (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170315e50
Visitors: 32
Filed: Mar. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is plaintiff Azucena Castro's motion in limine. (ECF No. 25). Defendants Craig Poulton and USF Reddaway, Inc. filed a response (ECF No. 28), to which plaintiff replied (ECF No. 30). "Motions in limine will not be considered unless the movant attaches a statement certifying that the parties have participated in the meet-and-confer process and have been unable to resolve the matter without court action." LR 16-3(a). In the
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is plaintiff Azucena Castro's motion in limine. (ECF No. 25). Defendants Craig Poulton and USF Reddaway, Inc. filed a response (ECF No. 28), to which plaintiff replied (ECF No. 30). "Motions in limine will not be considered unless the movant attaches a statement certifying that the parties have participated in the meet-and-confer process and have been unable to resolve the matter without court action." LR 16-3(a). In the i..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is plaintiff Azucena Castro's motion in limine. (ECF No. 25). Defendants Craig Poulton and USF Reddaway, Inc. filed a response (ECF No. 28), to which plaintiff replied (ECF No. 30).
"Motions in limine will not be considered unless the movant attaches a statement certifying that the parties have participated in the meet-and-confer process and have been unable to resolve the matter without court action." LR 16-3(a). In the instant motion, plaintiff has failed to attach the requisite certifying statement.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion in limine (ECF No. 25) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
Source: Leagle