EBERWEIN v. CHASE MORTGAGE, 2:17-cv-00028-JCM-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170324h35
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Second Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s ("Chase") 1 response to Plaintiff Angela C. Eberwein's complaint currently is due March 23, 2017. Chase has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, that Chase has up to and including April 6, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint, to provide additional time for Chase to investigate Plaintiff's alle
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Second Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s ("Chase") 1 response to Plaintiff Angela C. Eberwein's complaint currently is due March 23, 2017. Chase has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, that Chase has up to and including April 6, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint, to provide additional time for Chase to investigate Plaintiff's alleg..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(Second Request)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s ("Chase")1 response to Plaintiff Angela C. Eberwein's complaint currently is due March 23, 2017. Chase has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, that Chase has up to and including April 6, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint, to provide additional time for Chase to investigate Plaintiff's allegations and for the parties to continue discussing a potential early resolution of the claims asserted against Chase.
This is the second request for such an extension, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Complaint incorrectly names "Chase Mortgage" and "J P Morgan Chase Bank" as defendants, rather than JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Source: Leagle
