ORDER

(Mot. Ext. Time — ECF No. 1758)

PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on the Defendant Ryan C. Bundy's Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 1758), filed March 24, 2017. This Motion is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 and 1-7 of the Local Rules of Practice. The motion requests extensions of the "document deadline" related to Mr. Bundy's Motion to Dismiss Count Thirteen for Improper Venue (ECF No. 1678), Motion to Strike Counts Four and Eleven Because of Alibi Defense (ECF No. 1681), and Objection to Magistrate Order and Motion for De Novo Hearing Regarding Probable Cause and Pretrial Release on Own Recognizance (ECF No. 1720) (the "Objection"). The government has filed responses to two of Bundy's motions. See (ECF Nos. 1734, 1733). Mr. Bundy requests the extensions because he is "presently under 24 hour a day lock-down (in the `Hole')" with no access to pen, pencils or writing tools; a computer, discovery; regular mail or special or legal mail; the law library; or "his assistants of counsel and / or Standby Counsel." Mot. (ECF No. 1758) at 2. Thus, he asserts there is good cause for the court to "extend the deadline regarding each document for 10 days [sic] additional days from each individual the due date." Id. at 3. Having reviewed and considered the motion, the court will grant Mr. Bundy's request to extend the deadline to file a reply in support of his Motion to Dismiss Count Thirteen for Improper Venue and Motion to Strike Counts Four and Eleven Because of Alibi Defense until April 7, 2017. However, because the court has already denied Objection (ECF No. 1720), the request for an extension of time is now moot. Mr. Bundy filed the Objection on March 14, 2017, asking Chief District Judge Gloria M. Navarro to reconsider Magistrate Judge George W. Foley, Jr.'s Order (ECF No. 1550) denying Bundy's Motion for Own Recognizance or Bail Pending Trial (ECF No. 1082). On March 17, 2017, Judge Navarro denied Bundy's Objection and the related Motion for Hearing (ECF No. 1721) as untimely. See Min. Order (ECF No. 1729) (citing LR IB 3-1 and 3-5). Because Judge Navarro has already ruled on the Objection, there is no remaining document deadline to extend and Bundy's request is moot.1

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED: