CENTEX HOMES v. NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:16-cv-01958-JAD-VCF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170329800
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF EVEREST'S CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST LEXINGTON ECF NO. 61, 74 JENNIFER DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between attorney Joshua Zlotlow of Herold & Sager, counsel for defendant/cross-defendant Lexington Insurance Company, and Theodore J. Kurtz of Selman Breitman LLP, counsel for defendant/cross-claimant Everest National Insurance Company, that the cross-claim of Everest against Lexington be dismissed without prejudice, wi
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF EVEREST'S CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST LEXINGTON ECF NO. 61, 74 JENNIFER DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between attorney Joshua Zlotlow of Herold & Sager, counsel for defendant/cross-defendant Lexington Insurance Company, and Theodore J. Kurtz of Selman Breitman LLP, counsel for defendant/cross-claimant Everest National Insurance Company, that the cross-claim of Everest against Lexington be dismissed without prejudice, wit..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF EVEREST'S CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST LEXINGTON
ECF NO. 61, 74
JENNIFER DORSEY, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between attorney Joshua Zlotlow of Herold & Sager, counsel for defendant/cross-defendant Lexington Insurance Company, and Theodore J. Kurtz of Selman Breitman LLP, counsel for defendant/cross-claimant Everest National Insurance Company, that the cross-claim of Everest against Lexington be dismissed without prejudice, with each party to pay their own attorneys' fees and costs.
ORDER
Local Rule 7-1(c) states that "A stipulation that has been signed by fewer than all the parties or their attorneys will be treated — and must be filed — as a joint motion." This stipulation [ECF No. 74] is between defendant/cross-defendant Lexington Insurance Company and defendant/cross-claimant Everest National Insurance Company. Accordingly, I treat it as a joint motion under LR 7-1(c), find good cause, and GRANT it [ECF No. 74].
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Everest's cross-claim against Lexington is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs, and Lexington's Motion to Dismiss the Cross-claim [ECF No. 61] is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
