Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Sanchez, 2:15-CR-00213-JAD-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170331d96 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING AND DISPOSITION FOR MARIO D. SANCHEZ JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Defendant, MARIO DAVID SANCHEZ, by and through his counsel, TODD M. LEVENTHAL, ESQ., and the United States of America, by its counsel, SUSAN CUSHMAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney, that the trial in the above-captioned matter currently set for Monday April 3, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. be vacated and continued to at least 60 days to a time convenie
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING AND DISPOSITION FOR MARIO D. SANCHEZ

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Defendant, MARIO DAVID SANCHEZ, by and through his counsel, TODD M. LEVENTHAL, ESQ., and the United States of America, by its counsel, SUSAN CUSHMAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney, that the trial in the above-captioned matter currently set for Monday April 3, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. be vacated and continued to at least 60 days to a time convenient for the court.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons

1. Mr. Leventhal is in Trial for U.S. vs. Bundy et al., and will not be available for the sentencing hearing. 2. Mr. Sanchez is not in custody and agrees with the requested continuance. 3. Mr Leventhal has spoken to Susan Cushman, Assistant United States Attorney, and she has no objection to this continuance. 4. Additionally, denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court finds that:

1. Mr. Leventhal is in Trial for U.S. vs. Bundy et al., and will not be available for the sentencing hearing. 2. Mr. Sanchez is not in custody and agrees with the requested continuance. 3. Mr Leventhal has spoken to Susan Cushman, Assistant United States Attorney, and she has no objection to this continuance. 4. Additionally, denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would be best served by granting a continuance of the current Sentencing and Disposition Hearing and reset it for a time after June 29th 2017 at a time convenient for the court.

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS SO ORDERED that the current Sentencing and Disposition is vacated and the same is continued and reset for June 5, 2017, at the hour of 9:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer