Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RIPANDELLI v. CLARK COUNTY COLLECTION SERVICE, LLC, : 2:16-cv-03015-KJD-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170404c83 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF (Dkt. 14) (First Request) KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Heather Ripandelli ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Borg Law Group, LLC, and Brooke M. Borg (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On Janua
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF (Dkt. 14)

(First Request)

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Heather Ripandelli ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Borg Law Group, LLC, and Brooke M. Borg (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On January 30, 2017, Defendants filed a Motion For Summary Judgment [Dkt. #4] in the above-entitled action.

2. On February 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion Pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Dkt. #8].

3. Plaintiff and Defendants have already stipulated to extend the deadline for Defendants to Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment to Monday, April 3, 2017 (Dkt. 15).

4. After providing additional materials to Plaintiff, Defendants offered Plaintiff the opportunity to supplement her Opposition brief.

5. Plaintiff filed her Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief on March 16, 2017 (Dkt. 14).

6. Defendants shall have until Monday, April 3, 2017 to file their Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief.

7. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline made by the parties.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer