Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DUNPHY v. ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., 2:17-cv-00050-RFP-GWF (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170405c14 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2017
Summary: PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT'S STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY AND RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES (FIRST REQUEST) GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , District Judge . This Stipulation is entered by and between Plaintiff Theresa Dunphy ("Plaintiff"), on the one hand, and Defendant Alaska Airlines, Inc. ("Defendant"), on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel of record. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT: 1. Plaintiff has granted Defendant an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Reque
More

PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT'S STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY AND RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES

(FIRST REQUEST)

This Stipulation is entered by and between Plaintiff Theresa Dunphy ("Plaintiff"), on the one hand, and Defendant Alaska Airlines, Inc. ("Defendant"), on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel of record.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT:

1. Plaintiff has granted Defendant an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents, Set One ("RFP1"). Defendant's responses to RFP1 are now due on June 19, 2017;

2. Defendant has granted Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to Defendant's RFP1 and Special Interrogatories, Set One ("SROG1"). Plaintiff's responses to SROG1 and RFP1 are now due on July 3, 2017; and

3. Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed to a mutual extension on the deadline for the parties to exchange Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures. The agreed-upon deadline, as reflected in the Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, is April 10, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer