Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY v. SONRISA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 2:16-cv-01963-GMN-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170405h36 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS [FIRST REQUEST] PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR-IA 6-1, Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, on behalf of the Certificate Holders of Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-5, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-5 ( Deutsche Bank ), SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's ( SFR ), and Sonrisa Homeowners Association ( Sonrisa ) (collectively the Parties ) hereby stipulate and agree
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS [FIRST REQUEST]

Pursuant to LR-IA 6-1, Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, on behalf of the Certificate Holders of Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-5, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-5 (Deutsche Bank), SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's (SFR), and Sonrisa Homeowners Association (Sonrisa) (collectively the Parties) hereby stipulate and agree to extend the March 30, 2017 dispositive motion deadline as follows:

1. The Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order [ECF 20] set the dispositive motion deadline for March 30, 2017;

2. At or about 7:00 P.M. on March 30, 2017 the Parties learned they were each unable to file their respective dispositive motion because no Party could access the CM/ECF system;

3. The Parties agree to extend the dispositive motion deadline to March 31, 2017, or, the next court day when the CM/ECF system is functional;

4. Pursuant to LR IC 3-1(c) "[a] filer whose filing is made untimely because of a technical failure may seek appropriate relief from the court." Here the Parties made a good faith effort to comply with the filing deadline but were unable to due to technical failures; and

5. This stipulation is being submitted after the deadline because the Parties were unable to access the CM/ECF system prior to the expiration of the dispositive motion deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer