WOFFORD v. DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, 2:17-cv-00137-RFB-GWF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170405h40
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2017
Summary: JOINT MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Third Request) GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Richard M. Wofford ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint alleging negligent and willful violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act against Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation ("PHH"). (ECF No. 1). PHH and Plaintiff previously agreed to extend the time for PHH to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including April 3, 2017. (ECF
Summary: JOINT MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Third Request) GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Richard M. Wofford ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint alleging negligent and willful violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act against Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation ("PHH"). (ECF No. 1). PHH and Plaintiff previously agreed to extend the time for PHH to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including April 3, 2017. (ECF ..
More
JOINT MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Third Request)
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Richard M. Wofford ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint alleging negligent and willful violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act against Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation ("PHH"). (ECF No. 1). PHH and Plaintiff previously agreed to extend the time for PHH to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including April 3, 2017. (ECF Nos. 30, 32). Plaintiff and PHH now agree and stipulate to extend the time for PHH to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including April 24, 2017 to provide time for PHH to further investigate plaintiff's allegations and for the parties to discuss early resolution of the claims asserted against PHH.
PHH and Plaintiff further agree and stipulate that, notwithstanding the fact that PHH may not have answered or otherwise responded to Plaintiff's Complaint at the time of the conference, PHH will participate in any conference held by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f).
This request is made in good faith and not made for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
