Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SMITH v. ONE NEVADA CREDIT UNION, 2:17-cv-00193-JAD-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170407c23 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT ONE NEVADA CREDIT UNION TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) (FIRST REQUEST) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Joseph J. Smith ("Plaintiff") and Defendant One Nevada Credit Union ("Defendant") state the following: 1. The Motion to Dismiss was filed on March 15, 2017. (ECF No. 9). 2. Plaintiff filed his Response on March 31, 2017. (ECF No. 14). 3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT ONE NEVADA CREDIT UNION TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST) (FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff Joseph J. Smith ("Plaintiff") and Defendant One Nevada Credit Union ("Defendant") state the following:

1. The Motion to Dismiss was filed on March 15, 2017. (ECF No. 9).

2. Plaintiff filed his Response on March 31, 2017. (ECF No. 14).

3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, Defendant has seven days to file a reply to the Motion, or until April 7, 2017.

4. The parties agree that Defendant's Reply will be due on April 14, 2017, which is a one week extension.

5. This is the first request for extension by Defendant. Defendant is in trial and needs additional time to sufficiently prepare a Reply brief. This request is made in good faith, is not being made for the purposes of delay, and will not result in any delay in prosecuting this lawsuit.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer