ALVAREZ v. NEVEN, 3:15-cv-00363-RCJ-WGC. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170411c31
Visitors: 24
Filed: Apr. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Petitioner and respondents both have filed a motion for enlargement or extension of time. Good cause appearing; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time (first request) (ECF No. 42) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' unopposed motion for enlargement of time (first request) (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. Respondents will have through May 5, 2017, to file and serve a reply to petit
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Petitioner and respondents both have filed a motion for enlargement or extension of time. Good cause appearing; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time (first request) (ECF No. 42) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' unopposed motion for enlargement of time (first request) (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. Respondents will have through May 5, 2017, to file and serve a reply to petiti..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Petitioner and respondents both have filed a motion for enlargement or extension of time. Good cause appearing;
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time (first request) (ECF No. 42) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' unopposed motion for enlargement of time (first request) (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. Respondents will have through May 5, 2017, to file and serve a reply to petitioner's opposition to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 43).
Source: Leagle
