HUNT v. ZUFFA, LLC, 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170419g76
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BROCK LESNAR TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO EXCEED THE TWELVE-PAGE LIMIT FOR THE REPLY JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2, LR 7-1 and LR 7-3 the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiff Mark Hunt and Defendant Brock Lesnar hereby STIPULATE to extend the time for Mr. Lesnar to file a Reply in support of his Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25) (the "Motion") and to exceed t
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BROCK LESNAR TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO EXCEED THE TWELVE-PAGE LIMIT FOR THE REPLY JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2, LR 7-1 and LR 7-3 the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiff Mark Hunt and Defendant Brock Lesnar hereby STIPULATE to extend the time for Mr. Lesnar to file a Reply in support of his Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25) (the "Motion") and to exceed th..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BROCK LESNAR TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO EXCEED THE TWELVE-PAGE LIMIT FOR THE REPLY
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2, LR 7-1 and LR 7-3 the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiff Mark Hunt and Defendant Brock Lesnar hereby STIPULATE to extend the time for Mr. Lesnar to file a Reply in support of his Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25) (the "Motion") and to exceed the twelve-page limit for the Reply. Mr. Lesnar filed his Motion on March 23, 2017. Mr. Hunt filed his Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 42) on April 12, 2017. Mr. Lesnar's Reply is currently due on April 19, 2017. If approved, the forgoing parties have agreed to a one-week extension to file the Reply, which would make it due on April 26, 2017, and that the page-limit for the Reply be extended to no more than 15 pages. This is the first stipulation seeking to extend the Reply deadline and page limitation.
Mr. Lesnar submits that good cause exists to approve the requested stipulation as the requested one-week extension will provide Mr. Lesnar with sufficient time given the Easter holiday weekend and sufficient pages to address the numerous arguments raised by Mr. Hunt in the Opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
