Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JDH EX REL. DOMINGUEZ v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, 2:13-cv-01300-APG-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170420d25 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO LVMPD DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RETAX (FIRST REQUEST) [ECF No 133] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiffs JDH and Maria Hernandez, by and through their attorneys of record, Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell of McLetchie Shell, LLC, and Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department ("LVMPD"), LVMPD Officer J. Barker, and LVMPD Officer M. Purcaro, by and through their counsel of record, Craig R.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO LVMPD DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RETAX (FIRST REQUEST) [ECF No 133]

Plaintiffs JDH and Maria Hernandez, by and through their attorneys of record, Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell of McLetchie Shell, LLC, and Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department ("LVMPD"), LVMPD Officer J. Barker, and LVMPD Officer M. Purcaro, by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq., Nick D. Crosby, Esq., and Christian T. Balducci, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach Coffing, hereby agree to stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiffs to file their Reply to Defendants' Response to Motion to Retax Bill of Costs (ECF No. 133) which is currently due April 17, 2017, to April 24, 2017.

This stipulation is made because Plaintiffs' counsel has an opening brief due with the Nevada Supreme Court on April 17, 2017 in Martin v. State, Case No. 71806. Counsel for Plaintiffs also has an oral argument scheduled for April 20, 2017 at the Ninth Circuit in United States v. Steven Grimm, CA No. 16-10007, and will thus be out of the office April 19 through April 20, 2017. As such, the stipulation for an extension of time is not for any improper purpose or for the purpose of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Response to Motion to Retax Bill of Costs (ECF No. 133) in the above-referenced matter is extended to April 24, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer