STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 11)

(FIRST REQUEST)

JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, Wells Fargo Financial Nevada 2, Inc. ("Wells Fargo"), Defendant Eagle Creek Community Association ("Eagle Creek"), and Defendant and Counter-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR", and together with Wells Fargo and Eagle Creek, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel, as follows:

Eagle Creek filed a Motion to Dismiss Certain Causes of Action in Wells Fargo's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss," ECF No. 11) on April 11, 2017. SFR filed a Limited Response to the Motion to Dismiss ("SFR Response," ECF No. 14) on April 18, 2017. Wells Fargo's response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently due April 25, 2017. Eagle Creek's reply to SFR's Limited Opposition is also due April 25, 2017, and Eagle Creek's reply to Wells Fargo's response would be due May 2, 2017.

The Parties stipulate, agree, and request the Court enter an order providing that Wells Fargo's response to the Motion to Dismiss be extended until May 5, 2017. Additionally, the Parties stipulate, agree, and request the Court enter an order providing that Eagle Creeks reply to both the SFR Response and any response filed by Wells Fargo be extended to May 19, 2017.

This is the Parties' first request for an extension of time regarding the briefing schedule on the Motion to Dismiss, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. The Parties hereto agree to an extension in good faith in light of the litigation work load of the Parties, the excessive number of litigation matters currently in process for the Parties, and in order to provide time for the Parties to brief the issues relevant to this litigation which are constantly changing due to the high number of similar cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED.