JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Defendant SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC ("SFR"), Defendant THE SPRINGS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION (the "Association"), and Plaintiff NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC ("Nationstar")
1. This lawsuit involves the parties seeking quiet title/declaratory relief and other claims related to a non-judicial homeowner's association foreclosure sale conducted on a Property pursuant to NRS 116.
2. Pursuant to the scheduling plan and order [ECF No. 13], the dispositive motion deadline is April 20, 2017.
3. The Association filed its motion for summary judgment on April 18, 2017 [ECF No. 33.]
4. Undersigned counsel for SFR represented to counsel for Nationstar and the Association that on April 6, 2017, one of attorneys from Kim Gilbert Ebron ("KGE") assigned to the case on behalf of SFR was involved in a debilitating automobile accident, resulting in protracted absence from the firm. It is yet unclear as to when the attorney will have the capacity to return to work full-time and her workload is being reassigned.
5. Due to the foregoing, the Parties request additional time to submit their dispositive motions. This will allow SFR to either re-assign the case to a different attorney or allow for the return of the attorney originally assigned. Additionally it will allow Nationstar to file contemporaneously with SFR, thereby allowing these parties' motions to come before the Court at the same time for consideration of all facts and arguments.
6. The Parties also request that the time to respond to the Association's motion for summary judgment be extended to the same date as the time as responses to Nationstar's and SFR's motions will be due. This will also place all motions before the Court contemporaneously for consideration of any facts and issues that may be relevant to Nationstar's and SFR's motions.
7. The parties hereby respectfully request that the deadline for dispositive motions be extended to May 4, 2017 due to this unforeseeable accident and that the time to respond to the Association's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 33] be extended to be contemporaneous with the responses to Nationstar's and SFR's motions.
8. This is the first request for extension of the dispositive motion deadline and the request is not meant for purposes of delay or prejudice but to allow SFR to re-assign and fully brief its dispositive motion and allow the Court to consider all motions contemporaneously.
IT IS SO ORDERED: