Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

The Bank of New York Mellon v. Nevada New Builds, LLC, 2:16-cv-02894-RFB-GWF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170515720 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 12] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York Successor Trustee to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Trustee for the Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR3 (Plaintiff), and Defendant Canyon Will
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 12]

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York Successor Trustee to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Trustee for the Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR3 (Plaintiff), and Defendant Canyon Willow Tropicana (Defendant), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On February 16, 2017, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 12] (hereinafter "Motion")

2. The Parties stipulated to allow Plaintiff up to and including March 16, 2017 to respond to the Motion.

3. Plaintiff filed its Opposition to the Motion on March 16, 2017 [ECF No. 17].

4. Defendant had until March 23, 2017 to file a Reply in Support of the Motion.

5. The parties stipulated and agreed to allow Defendant a two-week extension to file a Reply.

6. The parties agreed and stipulated that Defendant had up to and including April 6, 2017 to file a Reply.

7. Additional time is necessary for counsel to respond due to the influx of cases in this area of litigation

8. The parties stipulate and agree to allow Defendant a one-week extension to file a Reply.

9. The parties agree and stipulate that Defendant has up to and including April 12, 2017 to file a Reply.

10. The extension in not being undertaken to cause delay or under prejudice to the parties of case.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer